Copyright holders are going to great lengths to discourage piracy. Clearly, what someone does not earn a "non-gain" is not the same as losing money, because your current wealth is not affected.
This means they will keep making music, even when there is little money to be made from it. For one thing, intellectual property rights are an important means by which people gain profit from the effort that they put into the production of creative works.
Actually, downloading songs could mean more income for musicians. They still engage in unfair practices, for example via DRM. Do you think some of the ways that the industry is trying to address this legal action, paid downloads, etc. Implications Adolescents are engaged in large numbers in music piracy.
What, then, should be done? Teens are not being reached with messages sent by those opposed to music piracy, and therefore the likelihood of it continuing at its current rate is high.
A large part of that is because record companies get the music out there, on to radio stations, all over MySpace, on MTV, so that you get to hear it for the first time.
But things are not so clear when the relationship between gain and loss are more complex. For one thing, intellectual property rights are an important means by which people gain profit from the effort that they put into the production of creative works.
Concerts plus merchandise like T-shirts are becoming a bigger source of income. And when it comes to peer-to-peer software, you can turn off the option to upload automatically.
I whip out my knitting tools and fashion myself the exact same scarf in 30 seconds, directly copying every aspect of its style and design.
Protecting public goods On the other hand, the fundamentalist libertarian position is problematic because it treats all intellectual property infringement as a victimless crime.
But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. Downloading non-copyrighted songs, that are freely available. The home-copy exception was only put into law on the condition that there would be a charge, or levy We may need to return to rules that are well suited to protecting different forms of property.Legally speaking, what they will be doing is a violation of intellectual property rights, or “piracy”.
But will they be doing anything morally wrong? It might seem obvious that what they will do is wrong. After all, it is illegal. But there are many things that have been illegal that people don’t think are morally wrong.
KISS frontman Paul Stanley believes that illegal music downloading is "morally" and "ethically wrong," and laments the fact that new artists "don't have a chance in hell" of "ever getting that pot.
When asked whether downloading music online or copying a CD was morally firth, morally wrong, or not a moral issue, only 1 in 13 (8%) said it was morally wrong.
Twenty-one percent said that downloading music was morally right. Downloading licensed music from the Internet, without permission, is wrong, as a lot of time and money is put into producing that music, with the expectation that those that want to hear it will pay for the privilege.
Aug 27, · I don't download music for free because I think it is Illegal and morally wrong but last year when the brits were on and dizzee rascal and florence and the machine were on and the song wasn't on itunes in Ireland I downloaded it from youtube downloader and now looking through my vast music library all legally downloaded except for this one song so I was wondering (a) if it is illegal to Status: Resolved.
Downloading music without permission is an example of theft and is immoral Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments.
You can also add to the debate by leaving a comment at the end of the page.Download